This is how bad it is

We have to elect Clinton and down-ballot Democrats. They we’ll have to deal with violent ignoramuses who will think Trump’s loss is due to rigging and are dreaming about a civil war.

Reporter tweets from Trump rally:

Jared Yates Sexton @JYSexton

I’ve covered the Trump campaign for over a year now and have seen this worsen. The anger changes, grows. It’s going to boil over.

It started with Muslims and moved to BLM. Then it was Clinton and calling for her death. Now it’s media. It won’t stop spreading.

Trump wasn’t Trump tonight. He was a megaphone spouting off Breitbart copy. It was organized and structured. Nuanced. That’s terrible news.

He kept crowd’s attention, which he’s never been able to do. He crafted a very dangerous narrative and they swallowed it whole.

See more: https://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/trump-rally-tweets-jared-yates-sexton/

Black Lives and Blue Lives

There’s a meme going around complaining that while mothers of “Young Men” (sarcastically printed in quotation marks) who were killed by police spoke at the Democratic National Convention, there were no family members of fallen heroes who were killed by “Thugs” (quotes mine).

Image described in paragraph above

But there were no family members of fallen heroes at the Republican National Convention, either. Family members of fallen heroes didn’t speak at either convention because we already agree that the deaths of police officers are tragic. That’s why we have severe penalties for violence against the police and compensation packages for family members of fallen heroes.

Those compensation packages would be more generous if Republicans didn’t fight against police unions. It’s only Republican lies that suggest Democrats are against the police. Democrats do more to support the police than Republicans do, but we all agree that the police deserve our support.

What we don’t all agree on is that something should be done about the few rogue cops who murder or brutalize the citizens they’re supposed to protect. Republicans seem to feel that the lives affected by dangerous or murderous acts committed by police don’t matter, as long as it’s not happening in their own neighborhoods. They claim that it’s best to just shut up about it, and that even mentioning the fact that sometimes people are murdered by police is the same as calling for the deaths of good cops.

Except for a few bad actors, nobody is calling for attacks on the police. That’s why Hillary Clinton praised the 500 applicants who wanted to become police officers in the aftermath of the Dallas murders, and why she said of the police, after Baton Rouge “They represent the rule of law itself. If you take aim at that and at them, you take aim at all of us. There can be no justification, no looking the other way.”

In my city, where “Police hugs make Sydnee smile”, community leaders and the police are working together. For those in Suffolk, there will be a Unity Parade, during National Night Out, and community leaders and police departments across the nation are working together in similar outreach efforts.

Dead cops isn’t the answer, but neither is ignoring the problem. It’s too bad that the phrase “All Lives Matter” was born as an attack on the Black Lives Matter movement. Indeed, all lives do matter, Black lives and blue lives included.

when was the last time Goldberg and I agreed about something?

“when was the last time Goldberg and I agreed about something?”

That’s Keven Drum, and the Goldberg he’s writing about is Jonah Goldberg. What they agree on is this, from Drum:

Trump repeatedly said “I disavow, I disavow, I disavow,” without ever mentioning who he was disavowing. …

… I don’t think this was a mistake. Trump has done it too many times. On Facebook, on Twitter, on Good Morning America, and then again last night. …

… there’s no video of him clearly and unequivocally condemning the Duke or the KKK—and they understand perfectly well what this means. They’re old hands at the wink and the nod.

and from Goldberg:

It is obvious to me that Trump didn’t want to denounce David Duke and the Klan in the Jake Tapper interview. The “bad earpiece” explanation is a transparent lie…

… But even when Trump disavowed Duke in the Friday press, this is how he did it:

“David Duke endorsed me? OK, all right. I disavow, OK?”

It’s clear he’s simply paying lip service, and reluctantly at that.

Trump’s racist supporters expect Trump to disavow them even if wants their vote, but they must be pleased about how he avoided specifically saying anything bad about them.

What was true about voting Republican is twice as true about voting for Trump.  In order to cut support for the poor, to close the borders to people fleeing for their lives, to keep government from interfering with the economic status quo of a nation who’s strength was bolstered by slavery, exploitation, and war, you have to side with White supremacists.  You may he a decent person with reasons that you feel are valid, but your positions are so unpopular that if it wasn’t for the worst people in the nation voting with you, your candidates wouldn’t win any elections.

To Confederates Who Don’t Hate

I’ve come across a lot of folks who display the Confederate flag but claim not to be racists, and claim that the Confederate flag is not a symbol of racism. I think most of them are full of shit.

This post is for the rest of you.

I’ve seen Confederates described as Dirt Ignorant, Flag Waving Bigots, but I know it doesn’t apply to all of you. I’ve also seen a Black Confederates’ website, I’ve read the Five IMPORTANT Facts I Did Not Know About That Flag. I saw a Confederate sticker next to an Obama sticker on a pick-up truck and an Obama sign in front of a Confederate statue in a neighbor’s yard. I see “Heritage not Hate” all over the place, and I’ve met people with Confederate tattoos who were among the kindest people in the world.

But I still say the Confederate flag is a symbol of racism.

Do I still need a history lesson? Fine. Send me some more links and I’ll take a look at them too. But only if you look at a couple of mine. Because I have read from Confederate apologist websites and spoken to people who claim that the Civil War wasn’t about slavery, but I can’t imagine anything anyone can say or write that would carry more weight than the words of the secessionists themselves.

Texas Declaration of Causes of Secession

So read The Declaration of Causes of Seceding States or the excerpts included in Ta-Nehisi Coates’s article in The Atlantic. Note such statements as

Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery..

, and

The people of the slave holding States are bound together by the same necessity and determination to preserve African slavery.

To get an idea of how dedicated the South was to slavery, read how it managed to continue the practice even after reconstruction, in this Wikepedia article and this excerpt from Slavery by Another Name by Douglas A. Blackmon.

… Green Cottenham was arrested by the sheriff of Shelby County, Alabama, and charged with “vagrancy.” … The next day … Cottenham was sold. … Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Company, gave the county $12 a month to pay off Cottenham’s fine and fees … Cottenham was subject to the whip for failure to dig the requisite amount, at risk of physical torture for disobedience, and vulnerable to the sexual predations of other miners— many of whom already had passed years or decades in their own chthonian confinement. …

Read how the Confederate Flag that you’re displaying was never really a symbol of Southern Heritage until the opponents of civil rights made it so.

But as a political symbol, the flag was revived when northern Democrats began to press for an end to the South’s system of racial oppression. In 1948, the Dixiecrats revolted against President Harry Truman—who had desegregated the armed forces and supported anti-lynching bills. The movement began in Mississippi in February of 1948, with thousands of activists “shouting rebel yells and waving the Confederate flag,” as the Associated Press reported at the time. Some actually removed old, mothballed flags from the trunks where they had until then been gathering dust.

The Southern Cross was created as a battle flag in a rebellion to defend slavery. It wasn’t even the original design.

Sure, the Civil War was about states rights, and it was also about economics, as so many wars are. But to say it wasn’t about slavery is ignorant or dishonest. The declarations made it absolutely clear.

Illustration Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Unlike the swastika, which had been used for various purposes by diverse peoples for thousands of years, the Confederate battle flag was born for no other reason than to be used in the war to preserve slavery in America.

Another difference between a swastika and a Confederate flag is, thanks to those who claim “heritage not hate”, bigots can display the flag as a signal to others while avoiding the consequences of openly declaring their perverted views. A Confederate bigot may occasionally bump into a Confederate who doesn’t hate, but he doesn’t have to worry as much as other bigots about outing himself to anyone who might cause him grief for doing so.

I know that “Heritage not Hate” exists. I know there are people who fly the flag and don’t mean any ill will by it. You are not a racist, and maybe you feel that being from the South provides you with a heritage that is separate from the rest of the United States but also separate from Slavery. But the evidence says otherwise.

The flag of the United States of America is yours as much as it is mine. I know that it too is stained with the mark of slavery. We have enslaved Africans, slaughtered Native Americans, threw Japanese Americans into concentration camps, and committed multitudes of other atrocities. But despite horrific setbacks, we progressed toward the ideal of equality under the law. That progress toward A More Perfect Union is what the American Flag stands for. The Confederate flag symbolizes resistance to that progress.

You still have your First Amendment right to fly whatever flag you want, but it’s time to stop lying to yourself and others about what the Confederate flag stood for, and acknowledge the hate you’re helping to spread by supporting its use.

If you don’t hate, then take down the flag.

Roof’s Black Friends

There was a disgusting and pathetic effort to spread the word that the murders of nine Black people in Charleston, South Carolina, wasn’t motivated by racism, but rather by the war on Christians that the right wing keeps complaining about. But now, I think most of us agree that the White terrorist who yelled “I’m here to shoot Black people” was probably motivated by racism.

Part of the effort to downplay the possibility of White racism was pointing out that Dylan Storm Roof had many Black friends on Facebook. All those Black friends might be vexing to some.

So I did what I could to look up the friends pictured in Gateway Pundit’s article “Weird… Half of Dylann Storm Roof’s Facebook Friends Are African-American”, and other sources, and of the few that still have their friends list open to the public, what I found was they have lots and lots of Facebook friends. They don’t live near Roof and don’t seem to have anything in common with him. They don’t even have a lot of White friends, but they do have one or two each. They don’t seem to be the kind of people who would turn down a friend request from anyone. Many also seem to have exactly the kinds of Facebook profiles that someone who hates Black people would use to justify their hatred.

Farah Stockman has a good take on Roof’s Black friends in the Boston Globe:

I couldn’t help but notice that Roof had a penchant for befriending black people who post over-the-top photos: One of his “friends” was a self-described rapper with a mouth full of gold teeth and a stack of $100 bills. Another worked at “X-Rated Mafia Records.” A third was a young black woman who posted numerous pictures of male genitalia, accompanied by belittling comments.

Dylan Storm Roof’s Black Friends were the closest thing to a shred of evidence suggesting that the attack on the AME church in Charleston was anything but a hate crime perpetuated by a White person against Black people, and yet the attempt to play down the racist motive was widespread. “Extraordinarily, they called it a hate crime,” said Fox News Host Steve Doocy.

Facebook friends are not real friends. Maybe it’s a little “Weird”, but it’s not shocking that a racist lunatic with a burning obsession with Black people would manage to become Facebook friends with large number of African Americans.

Update: I made a couple of changes within the first hour of posting, mostly to clean up poor structure. Also I added the information from the Boston Globe article.

Of Overgrown Negroes and Gay Weddings

“These [Southern whites] are not bad people. All they are concerned about is to see that their sweet little girls are not required to sit in school alongside some big overgrown Negroes.”

The above quote is what President Eisenhower said to Chief Justice Earl Warren at a White House dinner in 1954 (copied here from Digital History).

In theory, Eisenhower wasn’t against equal rights. He just empathized with Whites who didn’t want to get too close to Blacks because they felt that Black people where inherently dirty.

Those who support a business owner’s rights to selectively refuse certain services to gay people while agreeing with his or her obligation to serve gays as long as they don’t have to get up close and personal are reflecting Eisenhower’s bigotry.

It’s not about religion. There is no biblical distinction between serving pizza to gay people and catering their wedding. If your not killing them, you’re not following Leviticus. That’s a good thing, by the way.

It’s about cooties. There are thousands of ways to disobey God’s law (here’s 10) and many of us do so on a regular basis without being discriminated against by local merchants. But like the good ole Southerners concerned about their daughters sitting next to Black people, some people find the idea of being too close to gayness revolting. That’s not faith. That’s bigotry.

Update 2015/04/07. I also posted this on DailyKos, and commenter Goosrock wrote

Eisenhower Federalized the National Guard to force public school integration in Arkansas.

Part of the theory of democracy is that we don’t need all of our leaders to be messiahs, we can accept flawed ones who think all kinds of great people are icky so long as they govern justly.

States are nullifying federal law in a number of types around the country and will be doing more of it this year and next, but there is very little chance that President Obama will take as bold a step for the peoples’ rights as the bigot Mr. Eisenhower did.

While I don’t share Gooserock’s view about Obama, by mentioning Eisenhower only in the negative, I gave the impression that I don’t respect who he was. But he was a bold leader who held the nation together during difficult times, and there is much to admire him for.

Deah Barakat Was Not Pro-Terrorist

Update 2015/02/16: Stop Antisemitism Now has removed their link to the Bare Naked Islam article.

Stop Antisemitism Now, a Facebook group which I like, by the Facebook definition of the word, recently posted something that I don’t like at all. It was a link to a Bare Naked Islam article accusing murder victim Deah Barakat of tweeting “anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist, pro-terrorist tweets”. One out of three is bad. Barakat was certainly anti-Zionist, but the other two accusations are lies.

Bare Naked Islam, a website dedicated to promoting hatred if Islam, correctly pointed out Barakat’s anti-Zionist tweets such as,

https://twitter.com/JustBanter__/status/484412575049056256

,

and

But I looked at Barakat’s twitter feed and found a few items Bare Naked Islam didn’t bother to post,

,

and

Had I met Deah Barakat, we might have argued about the legitimacy of Israel. We might not have liked each other. But he was not pro-terrorist.

For calling out the lie in a comment on Stop Antisemitism Now’s post, I was called a “Self Loathing Jew”. It’s hard for me to defend myself against such comments since I lack any Jew cred, having lost my faith and having been raising hogs in Virginia and all, but whatever my feelings about myself may be, facts are still facts. A person can be anti-Zionist and even hateful of Israel, and neither be anti-Semitic nor pro-terrorist.

Bare Naked Islam is clear about its purpose, but Stop Antisemitism Now says its purpose is to “promote pride in Israel and in Judaism”, not to promote hatred of Islam. They should promote pride without allying themselves with hate groups.

Allen West: Latest Self-Serving Race-Baiting Lowlife to Compare Zimmerman/Martin to Unrelated, Horrific, Black on White Crimes

While talking on Fox News about George Zimmerman, Allen West demonstrated what a self-promoting scoundrel he is by referring to two horrific Black on White crimes and pointing out that “we still have not heard from the NAACP or the media”. One of those crimes involved the murder of a baby and the other to the gruesome murder of a couple in Knoxville.

The difference is those crimes were investigated and the criminals were punished. Is the NAACP supposed to call for an investigation? Is the NAACP supposed to demand their arrest? Or is Allen West waiting for the NAACP to come out with a statement saying, “Gosh, we Black folk sure do commit us some sick ass crimes.”?

As I previously pointed out, there have been Black on White and White on Black crimes before and since the Zimmerman case and I personally haven’t seen much about them in the headlines and I certainly haven’t seen the NAACP call for justice for either Black on White or White on Black crimes in which the killers have been apprehended.

Allen West brought up these crimes for the same reason White supremacist sites blog about them. They’re particularly heinous, the victims were White, and the criminals Black. They have nothing to do with Zimmerman. These sick crimes strike revulsion in the hearts of almost every Black person who hears about them just as they do for almost every White person, but they give bigots something to point to and say, “This is what Black people are like”.

Colonel West managed to rile up a bunch of bigots, some of whom are ready to put West in the White House so they can continue talk about what depraved animals they think -most- Black people are while saying, “But I’m not a bigot, I supported a Black guy”.

“Martha Speaks” is a story about a talking dog. In the Martha books, other dogs are still slobbering animals but Martha is almost human. That’s what your supporters think of you, Colonel West. And since they have so little knowledge of or respect for the White House that they’ll vote for a guy just because he seems like the kind of guy you can have a beer with, they’d be just as willing vote for a guy who they think of as almost human just to deflect accusations of racism, as long as the almost human figurehead serves to promote their message. These are the people that you’re pandering to, and their ideas are the ideas that you’re endorsing by using cases of horrific violence to make accusations about reverse racism.

They’re Trying to Spoil my Happy

I’m trying to hold on to the joyous feeling I had this morning but the negative reactions to DOMA that I’ve been reading and hearing recently made me go from wanting to hug a gay guy to wanting to beat the crap out of a bigot with an iron pipe.

Justice Scalia was the first jackass to attack my good mood. Not for dissenting, but for being such an outstanding hypocrite about it. From TPM: “24 Hours After Striking Voting Rights, Scalia Cries Out For Judicial Restraint

It’s worth reading, rather then just skimming, to realize the depth of Justice Scalia’s hypocrisy decrying the Supreme Court’s power to block the will of Congress. As TPM points out, regarding health care, Scalia was

prepared to repeal in its entirety a duly passed piece of legislation on the basis that it exceeded Congress’ authority under the Commerce Clause and other provisions of the Constitution. This is so even though nearly 200 years of precedent establish that there is “no sort of trade” that Congress cannot regulate and that lawmakers have “full power” over interstate commerce.

and, about gutting the Voting Rights Act, TPM continues, “Just Yesterday”, Justice Scalia and and four others

had no trouble finding that a 50-year-old statute reauthorized less than a decade ago with overwhelming support should be invalidated with the wave of their wands.

While it seems silly to be surprised by Scalia’s hypocrisy, I still sometimes am. Just like I occasionally have to say, “Wow, it’s cold!” on an not-record-breaking Winter day, I also occasionally have to say “Wow, what a hypocrite!” after a typical action by Justice Scalia.

Moving from hypocritical to stupid, Rand Paul thinks this will open the door to marriage between humans and non-humans. I’m so fucking fed up with idiots comparing homosexuality to bestiality. The key difference is, “Consenting Adults”. You know what will happen long before liberals push for human-non-human marriages? Wingnuts like Paul pushing for marriages to the unborn. It’s the perfect marriage (pun intended) between idea of “personhood” and the mostly red-state tradition of marrying young.

As far as polygamy goes, I can accept the government saying “Pick one”, for the sake of record keeping and keeping a handle on beneficiaries. But other than trying to prevent people from bilking the government, I have no problem with somebody else’s polygamy. But thats just my opinion. In reality, striking down DOMA doesn’t open the door to polygamy any more than signing DOMA did. Think about it. It was DOMA that instructed the federal government to define marriage according to the Bible, and it’s the Bible, not gay rights activists, which supports polygamy.

Wonkette has more on the stupid.

The Wonkette link above also takes us to the violent:

Personally, while I think “I predict” is a matter of free speech, “Go get em” is incitement. Somebody should arrest that piece of shit.

All this over a ruling which doesn’t mean as much as a lot of people may think. This has done almost nothing, for example, for gay couples in Virginia.

But still, this ruling is a big step in the right direction (that’s the left direction, actually) and I’m not going to let the idiots and bigots spoil the moment. And I do have an iron pipe handy if I need it.

If they were Muslim..

I don’t always agree with “If it were a [whatever] guy… ” or “I bet they wouldn’t have done that to a [whatever] … “, but I find it very hard to disagree with this:

Can you imagine the panic if a prosecutor, then the District Attorney and his wife in one state, and in the meantime the head of prisons in another state, were killed by Muslim supremacists? The simultaneous pants-shitting of every state legislator south of the Mason-Dixon line would be loud and prolonged…

… Luckily, the suspects in these crimes are members of the Aryan Brotherhood, not the Muslim Brotherhood, so we can just let the police do their job …